{"id":1435,"date":"2026-06-09T01:51:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-09T01:51:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/betterlending.net\/blog\/?p=1435"},"modified":"2026-06-12T05:33:16","modified_gmt":"2026-06-12T05:33:16","slug":"crypto-loan-tax-uae-what-borrowers-need-to-know","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/betterlending.net\/blog\/index.php\/2026\/06\/09\/crypto-loan-tax-uae-what-borrowers-need-to-know\/","title":{"rendered":"Crypto Loan Tax UAE: What Borrowers Need to Know(2026 Guide)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Crypto loan tax UAE for most individual residents, is a non-issue. Loan proceeds received in USDT or another stablecoin are not treated as income under UAE law, and no capital gains tax applies to individual investors at the point of borrowing. The position for corporate borrowers is more nuanced: a company that takes a crypto-backed loan still avoids immediate tax on the proceeds, but a forced liquidation of collateral may constitute a taxable disposal under the UAE Corporate Tax Law (Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The most important risk for most UAE borrowers is not tax \u2014 it is leverage. A Bitcoin loan structured at 30% loan-to-value (LTV) leaves substantial collateral buffer against a 50% market decline. A loan at 90% LTV can trigger liquidation on a 10\u201315% price move. Understanding this distinction before committing collateral is more consequential for most borrowers than any tax analysis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How Crypto Loan Tax Works in the UAE<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

UAE personal income tax does not exist. The country applies a 0% rate on individual income, including investment income, capital gains, and proceeds from financial transactions such as crypto-backed borrowing. When a Bitcoin holder deposits BTC as collateral and receives USDT in return, no ownership transfer of the Bitcoin has occurred \u2014 the borrower retains legal and beneficial ownership of the collateral. The USDT received is a liability, not income. The cause is a pledge of collateral; the effect is receipt of loan proceeds; the tax outcome for individuals is zero.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For a more detailed breakdown of the legal basis, see Are Crypto Loans Taxable in the UAE?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The contrast with selling Bitcoin is direct. Selling converts a capital asset into realised proceeds. Borrowing does not. In most jurisdictions this distinction triggers capital gains tax on a sale. In the UAE, neither event generates personal tax \u2014 but the borrowing route preserves market exposure, which is the primary financial motivation for the strategy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Individual Borrowers vs Corporate Borrowers<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The crypto loan tax position in the UAE diverges materially depending on whether the borrower is an individual or a corporate entity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Category<\/th>Individual Investor<\/th>Corporate Entity<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Borrowing taxable?<\/td>No<\/td>No<\/td><\/tr>
Liquidation taxable?<\/td>Generally no<\/td>Potentially yes<\/td><\/tr>
Interest expense deductible?<\/td>Not applicable<\/td>Deductible with limits<\/td><\/tr>
Reporting obligations?<\/td>Minimal currently<\/td>UAE CT return, potential CARF<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Individual investors benefit from a 0% personal income tax rate with no threshold. Corporate entities are subject to a 9% corporate tax rate on taxable income exceeding AED 375,000 per financial year. Businesses with revenue below AED 3,000,000 may qualify for Small Business Relief, effectively deferring corporate tax obligations for eligible entities. Free Zone entities that derive Qualifying Income and meet the substance requirements of the Qualifying Free Zone Person regime may benefit from a 0% rate on that income \u2014 but the rules are specific and require formal analysis, not assumption.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For a full treatment of the USDT borrowing question specifically, see Does Borrowing USDT Against Bitcoin Create Tax Liability in the UAE?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Can Bitcoin Liquidation Create a Crypto Loan Tax Liability?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Liquidation is the mechanism most likely to produce an adverse tax outcome, particularly for corporate borrowers. When a lender sells collateral to recover a loan, this is generally treated as a disposal of the asset \u2014 not simply a return of collateral.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Consider a base scenario: a borrower holds 2 BTC worth $125,336 and takes a $37,600 loan at 30% LTV. If Bitcoin falls 50%, the collateral value drops to approximately $62,668. At $37,600 outstanding, the loan is now at roughly 60% LTV \u2014 within range of a margin call threshold but not yet liquidated. The borrower remains solvent, the collateral is not seized, and no disposal occurs. Tax outcome: zero.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now compare two higher-leverage scenarios:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At 60% LTV ($75,000 loan against $125,336 collateral), a 50% Bitcoin decline brings collateral to approximately $62,668 against a $75,000 loan \u2014 breaching most standard margin call thresholds. The lender issues a margin call. If the borrower cannot post additional collateral or partially repay, the lender liquidates. For a corporate borrower, this liquidation may be treated as a disposal generating a taxable gain based on the difference between the liquidation proceeds and the original acquisition cost of the BTC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At 90% LTV ($90,000 against $100,000 collateral), a 20\u201330% price decline is sufficient to trigger liquidation. This is high-risk structuring that creates both liquidation exposure and, for corporate borrowers, near-certain tax implications on any disposal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For a detailed analysis of the liquidation scenario and its legal consequences, see What Happens If Bitcoin Collateral Is Liquidated in the UAE?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Borrow Against Bitcoin vs Sell Bitcoin<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

For UAE individual investors, the tax advantage of borrowing over selling is structurally smaller than in high-tax jurisdictions because neither event triggers personal tax. The decision is therefore driven primarily by market positioning and capital efficiency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Factor<\/th>Sell Bitcoin<\/th>Borrow Against Bitcoin<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Tax treatment (individual)<\/td>0% \u2014 no capital gains tax<\/td>0% \u2014 not taxable<\/td><\/tr>
Tax treatment (corporate)<\/td>Potential 9% on gains<\/td>No immediate tax<\/td><\/tr>
Market exposure<\/td>Eliminated<\/td>Retained<\/td><\/tr>
Liquidity<\/td>Immediate<\/td>Immediate (via loan proceeds)<\/td><\/tr>
Cost<\/td>No interest<\/td>Annual interest (typically 8\u201315%)<\/td><\/tr>
Risk<\/td>None after sale<\/td>Liquidation risk if LTV too high<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

For individual UAE residents, the decision is almost always driven by market exposure. A holder who expects Bitcoin to appreciate has a direct financial reason not to sell. The borrowing route keeps the position intact while unlocking liquidity. The interest cost \u2014 typically 8\u201315% per year depending on the platform and LTV \u2014 is the price of retaining upside. For corporate entities, the additional factor is the 9% corporate tax that would apply to a disposal generating a gain, making the borrowing route more tax-efficient regardless of market view. see Borrow Against MATIC, XRP, BNB, and SOL: A Strategic Guide to Altcoin Collateral Lending<\/a>
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

UAE Corporate Tax Rules and Crypto Loans<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The UAE Corporate Tax Law applies a 9% rate to taxable income above AED 375,000 for entities incorporated or effectively managed in the UAE. Several rules interact directly with crypto-backed borrowing structures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Interest deductibility is available but subject to a General Interest Limitation Rule capping net interest expense at 30% of adjusted EBITDA. For borrowing entities with substantial operating income, this limit may not bind. For entities whose primary activity is holding Bitcoin, the EBITDA base may be thin, limiting the practical deduction available. An AED 12 million de minimis threshold means entities with net interest expense below this amount are not subject to the limitation \u2014 relevant for smaller borrowing structures. Excess interest expense that cannot be deducted in a given year may be carried forward to future years under the carry-forward rules.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For related-party borrowing \u2014 for example, a UAE holding company borrowing from a related offshore entity using BTC as collateral \u2014 the arm’s length principle applies. The interest rate, LTV terms, and collateral management arrangements must all reflect what unrelated parties would agree to under comparable circumstances. Structures that fail this test risk interest deduction challenges and potential transfer pricing adjustments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Free Zone entities must be particularly careful. A Qualifying Free Zone Person (QFZP) benefits from a 0% rate on Qualifying Income but is taxed at 9% on Domestic Income and non-qualifying income. Whether the proceeds or gains from crypto lending activities constitute Qualifying Income under the Ministerial Decisions depends on the nature of the income and whether the activity is conducted through a permanent establishment outside the Free Zone. Blanket assumptions of 0% treatment are not supportable without documented analysis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

VARA, ADGM and DFSA Lending Rules<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Regulatory oversight of crypto lending in the UAE is jurisdiction-specific. Which regulator applies depends on where the lending activity occurs and the nature of the entity conducting it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) regulates virtual asset activities in the Emirate of Dubai, excluding the special financial zones. Entities operating crypto lending platforms in Dubai must hold a VARA licence under the Virtual Asset Service Provider framework. VARA’s lending rules address collateral management, custody expectations, and borrower disclosures. Custody of collateral must be conducted by a licensed Custodian or through arrangements that meet VARA’s safeguarding standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) operates as an independent financial centre and regulates virtual asset activities through the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA). Entities providing financial services involving virtual assets in ADGM must be licensed under the FSRA’s Virtual Asset framework. ADGM has developed one of the earliest and most detailed regulatory frameworks for crypto lending in the region.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) regulates activities within the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC). The DFSA’s crypto token regime applies to specified investment tokens, and lending structures involving regulated tokens within the DIFC require DFSA authorisation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Borrowers using platforms that operate without the appropriate licence \u2014 or platforms licensed in foreign jurisdictions without UAE recognition \u2014 face counterparty risk and potential regulatory exposure. The regulatory status of the lending platform affects collateral recovery rights, dispute resolution, and reporting obligations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

CARF Reporting and UAE Crypto Loan Tax Obligations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The OECD’s Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) introduces a standardised system for the automatic exchange of tax information relating to crypto-asset transactions. The UAE has signed up to the CARF regime, with reporting preparation expected to begin in 2027 and information sharing between jurisdictions commencing in 2028.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Under CARF, Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs) \u2014 including exchanges, custodians, and lending platforms \u2014 are required to collect and report specified information on users and their transactions. Crypto loans are reported as a distinct category from outright sales. Collateral transfers are separately identifiable. This distinction matters: a borrower depositing Bitcoin as collateral and receiving USDT is not treated identically to a borrower who sells Bitcoin \u2014 but the transaction is still reported.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For UAE-resident individual borrowers, CARF reporting by a CASP does not, in itself, create tax liability. There is no income to report to UAE authorities because no UAE income tax applies. The relevance is primarily for borrowers who also have tax residency obligations in other jurisdictions \u2014 for example, a US citizen resident in Dubai remains subject to US tax reporting requirements irrespective of UAE residency. CARF-derived data shared with the IRS could expose such individuals to unreported foreign financial account issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For corporate borrowers, the CARF-reported data flows to the UAE Federal Tax Authority and potentially to treaty partners. Where a corporate structure involves related entities in multiple jurisdictions, the volume and nature of crypto transactions reported under CARF could inform transfer pricing audits or source-of-funds inquiries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For a full breakdown of the reporting rules and what borrowers should be preparing now, see UAE Crypto Reporting Rules and CARF Explained for Borrowers<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Crypto Loan Tax UAE vs USA, UK, Canada and Australia<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The UAE’s tax treatment of crypto-backed borrowing is among the most favourable available to individual investors globally. The comparison below reflects the current position for individual (non-corporate) borrowers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Country<\/th>Borrowing<\/th>Liquidation<\/th>Interest<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
UAE<\/td>Not taxable<\/td>Generally not taxable (individual)<\/td>No personal tax deduction applicable<\/td><\/tr>
USA<\/td>Not taxable<\/td>Taxable disposal \u2014 capital gains tax applies<\/td>Not deductible for most individuals<\/td><\/tr>
UK<\/td>Not taxable<\/td>Taxable disposal \u2014 CGT applies<\/td>Not deductible<\/td><\/tr>
Canada<\/td>Not taxable<\/td>Taxable disposal \u2014 50% inclusion rate applies<\/td>Not deductible<\/td><\/tr>
Australia<\/td>Not taxable<\/td>Taxable disposal \u2014 CGT applies (50% discount if held 12+ months)<\/td>Not deductible<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

In the USA, liquidation of Bitcoin collateral by a lender is treated as a constructive sale, triggering capital gains tax based on the difference between the fair market value at liquidation and the original acquisition cost. A Bitcoin holder who acquired 1 BTC at $10,000 and has that BTC liquidated at $60,000 faces a $50,000 capital gain \u2014 taxed at up to 20% federal plus applicable state rates. The identical event in the UAE produces no personal tax.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The combination of 0% personal income tax, 0% capital gains tax, and no inheritance or wealth tax makes the UAE structurally advantageous for individual crypto holders seeking liquidity without disposal. For individuals with global income or assets, the interaction with home-country tax obligations requires separate analysis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For a detailed side-by-side analysis of borrowing outcomes, see Crypto Loan Tax USA vs UAE: Key Differences Borrowers Should Know<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"crypto<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Bitcoin Loan Decision Framework<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The following three scenarios illustrate how LTV choice determines risk profile. Crypto loan tax in the UAE is a secondary consideration for individual borrowers; leverage is primary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scenario A \u2014 Conservative (30% LTV)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Collateral: 2 BTC valued at $125,336. Loan: $37,600. LTV: 30%. If Bitcoin falls 50%, collateral value drops to approximately $62,668 and effective LTV rises to approximately 60%. Outcome: no margin call at most platforms, no liquidation, no taxable event.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scenario B \u2014 Moderate Risk (60% LTV)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Collateral: $125,336 in BTC. Loan: $75,000. LTV: 60%. If Bitcoin falls 50%, collateral drops to approximately $62,668 against a $75,000 loan \u2014 effective LTV of approximately 120%. Outcome: margin call is certain. For a corporate borrower, liquidation triggers a potential disposal and 9% tax exposure on any gain above acquisition cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Scenario C \u2014 Extreme Risk (90% LTV)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Collateral: $100,000 in BTC. Loan: $90,000. LTV: 90%. A 20\u201330% price decline breaches the liquidation threshold. This structure is appropriate only for very short-term bridging with a clear repayment path. For most buy-and-hold Bitcoin holders, 90% LTV is not a borrowing strategy \u2014 it is a risk of total collateral loss.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The practical conclusion across all three scenarios is consistent: the real risk is leverage, not taxation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Key Strategic Takeaway<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

For UAE individual residents, the sell-versus-borrow decision has little to do with crypto loan tax \u2014 both routes produce 0% personal tax \u2014 and everything to do with market conviction. Selling eliminates upside entirely; borrowing retains the full position at the cost of interest, typically 8\u201315% annually. For corporate entities, a disposal of Bitcoin held at a significant gain triggers a 9% corporate tax charge above the AED 375,000 threshold, making borrowing the structurally more efficient route.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The consistent failure mode for UAE crypto borrowers is not tax exposure \u2014 it is LTV discipline. Borrowers below 40% LTV maintain flexibility through significant market declines; borrowers above 70% LTV are effectively betting on short-term price stability. If you are evaluating a Bitcoin-backed loan and want a framework for structuring it correctly, the BetterLending Crypto Loans Guide<\/a> covers LTV strategy and collateral management in detail.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Are crypto loans taxable in the UAE?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

For UAE individual residents, borrowing against Bitcoin or any crypto asset is not a taxable event. No personal income tax, capital gains tax, or transfer tax applies to the act of pledging collateral and receiving a loan. The loan proceeds are a liability, not income.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is Bitcoin liquidation taxable in the UAE?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

For individual UAE residents, liquidation of crypto collateral generally does not create personal tax, as there is no capital gains tax regime. For UAE corporate entities subject to Corporate Tax Law, a forced liquidation may constitute a disposal and generate taxable income at 9% on any gain above the AED 375,000 threshold.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Do UAE companies pay tax on crypto gains?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Yes. UAE corporate entities subject to the Corporate Tax Law pay 9% on taxable income exceeding AED 375,000 per year. Gains on disposal of crypto assets held on a corporate balance sheet are generally included in taxable income, subject to applicable exemptions and the Qualifying Free Zone Person rules.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Does CARF affect UAE crypto loan borrowers?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

CARF will require Crypto-Asset Service Providers to report transaction data, including crypto loans and collateral transfers, to the UAE Federal Tax Authority beginning around 2027\u20132028. For individual UAE residents with no foreign tax residency, this reporting does not create tax liability in the UAE. For individuals with tax obligations in other jurisdictions, the reported data may be shared with foreign tax authorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Can a Free Zone company use crypto-backed loans?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Yes, but the tax treatment requires careful analysis. A Qualifying Free Zone Person (QFZP) benefits from 0% tax on Qualifying Income. Whether borrowing proceeds, interest income, or collateral gains qualify for the 0% rate depends on the nature of the activity and whether it is conducted through the Free Zone or a mainland permanent establishment. Do not assume 0% treatment without documented analysis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is borrowing better than selling Bitcoin for a UAE individual?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In a 0% personal tax environment, the tax advantage of borrowing over selling is smaller than in high-tax jurisdictions. The primary reason UAE residents borrow against Bitcoin rather than selling is to retain market exposure. Interest costs (typically 8\u201315% per year) are the price of that decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What happens after a margin call?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

After a margin call, the borrower typically has a defined window \u2014 often 24\u201372 hours \u2014 to either deposit additional collateral, partially repay the loan to reduce LTV, or both. If the borrower does not act within the required timeframe, the lender liquidates sufficient collateral to restore the loan to a safe LTV ratio. The borrower retains any remaining collateral after liquidation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Does VARA regulate crypto lending in Dubai?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Yes. Entities providing crypto lending services in the Emirate of Dubai (outside DIFC and ADGM) require a Virtual Asset Service Provider licence from VARA. The licence covers lending activities, collateral custody, and borrower disclosures. Borrowers should verify the regulatory status of any lending platform before committing collateral.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Can interest on a crypto-backed loan be deducted by a corporate borrower?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Yes, subject to limits. Net interest expense is deductible up to 30% of adjusted EBITDA under the UAE Corporate Tax General Interest Limitation Rule. An AED 12 million de minimis threshold means this cap does not apply to entities with net interest expense below that amount. Excess interest can be carried forward to future periods.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What information is reported under CARF for crypto loan tax purposes?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Crypto-Asset Service Providers are required to report the user’s name, address, tax identification number, jurisdiction of residence, and transaction details. Transactions are categorised by type: sale, exchange, crypto loan, collateral transfer, or other. The transfer type is reported \u2014 meaning a crypto loan is distinguishable in the data from an outright sale. The volume, asset type, and counterparty details are also included in the reporting obligation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is there a difference between borrowing in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and UAE Free Zones?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The UAE Corporate Tax Law applies uniformly across the mainland and most Free Zones, with special treatment for Qualifying Free Zone Persons. The regulatory framework differs: VARA applies in Dubai (outside financial centres), the FSRA applies in ADGM (Abu Dhabi), and the DFSA applies in DIFC (Dubai). Individual borrowers face 0% personal tax regardless of UAE emirate. The regulatory and licensing requirements of the lending platform depend on its operating jurisdiction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What is the most important factor when structuring a crypto loan in the UAE?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

LTV management. Most adverse outcomes for UAE crypto borrowers result from over-leveraging, not from crypto loan tax exposure. A conservative LTV of 25\u201335% provides substantial buffer against Bitcoin volatility. Every percentage point increase in LTV above 50% materially increases the probability of a margin call during a normal market correction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Disclaimer<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The information in this article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute tax, legal, or financial advice. UAE tax law and virtual asset regulations are subject to change, and the application of any rule depends on individual circumstances. Readers should consult a qualified UAE tax adviser or legal professional before making any borrowing, disposal, or structuring decisions involving crypto assets.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Crypto loan tax UAE for most individual residents, is a non-issue. Loan proceeds received in USDT or another stablecoin are not treated as income under…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1449,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[87,85,83,84,82,79,81,88,86,80],"class_list":["post-1435","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-bitcoin-loan-uae","tag-bitcoin-backed-loans-abudhabi","tag-borrow-against-bitcoin-uae","tag-carf-reporting-uae","tag-crypto-borrowing-dubaicrypto-borrowing-dubai","tag-crypto-collateral-dubai","tag-crypto-loan-liquidation","tag-crypto-loan-tax-uae","tag-uae-crypto-tax","tag-vara-crypto-lending"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/betterlending.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1435","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/betterlending.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/betterlending.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/betterlending.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/betterlending.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1435"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/betterlending.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1435\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1453,"href":"https:\/\/betterlending.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1435\/revisions\/1453"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/betterlending.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1449"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/betterlending.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1435"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/betterlending.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1435"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/betterlending.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1435"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}